BBS Radio TV Station Streams

Chuck And Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden

Colorado GOP at a Crossroads, the Fight for Grassroots Control
Guest, Jermey Goodall

Former CO GOP Chair Horn’s personal attorney makes his move to plunder the Party bank accounts. Plus Chair candidate Jeremy Goodall joins the show.

The Chair Race and the Fight Over Open Primaries

In this episode of The Chuck & Julie Show, Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden focus on the Colorado Republican Party’s internal fight over leadership, money, and control of the primary process. Their main guest is Jeremy Goodall, a candidate for Colorado Republican Party chair, ahead of the May 30 election in Buena Vista. The discussion begins with the party’s push to opt out of Colorado’s open primary system, which the hosts and Goodall argue allows unaffiliated voters and Democrats to influence Republican candidate selection. Goodall says his position is that the chair must serve the will of the Republican Party’s rank-and-file members, and he states that if elected, he would continue pushing to remove the party from the open primary system.

Jeremy Goodall’s Vision for Party Leadership

Goodall presents himself as a grassroots-aligned candidate who believes the party needs to rebuild from the bottom up rather than through top-down control or donor-driven politics. He argues that the Colorado GOP’s financial problems are not the root problem but a symptom of dysfunction, mistrust, and internal antagonism. His proposed solution is to empower county chairs, encourage difficult but necessary conversations, and create enough trust that ordinary Republicans will be willing to contribute time, effort, and small donations. He points to the Protect Kids Colorado initiative as an example of what can happen when volunteers are given a clear goal and a strong vision, noting that thousands of volunteers helped gather more signatures than expected.

Money, Trust, and Grassroots Fundraising

The hosts press Goodall on the reality that the Colorado GOP is deeply broke and may need hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars. Goodall acknowledges that fundraising is difficult, especially under Colorado’s strict campaign finance limits, and says the party cannot rely only on a few wealthy donors. Instead, he argues that the party must restore confidence and build a broad base of smaller donors. The conversation frames money as tied directly to trust: if members believe the party has a purpose, direction, and integrity, they will be more likely to give. Goodall also stresses creativity, vision, and focusing on what the party can do rather than becoming paralyzed by what it cannot afford.

Brita Horn, Steve Klenda, and the Legal Crisis

A major portion of the episode centers on the hosts’ account of the legal and financial crisis involving former chair Brita Horne and attorney Steve Klenda. Julie explains that, according to their understanding, Klenda has a $231,000 judgment against the party plus 18% interest, and that this does not simply mean the party owes him money, but that he may be able to garnish Colorado Republican Party bank accounts. The hosts say party attorneys are working to stop or delay the process, but they describe the situation as dire because any stay appears to depend on a $289,000 bond that the party cannot realistically post. They argue that whoever becomes the next chair will immediately inherit this crisis and that the party must unite around survival before other disputes can matter.

The Deeper Divide Inside the Republican Party

The episode also explores the larger philosophical divide between grassroots Republicans and what the hosts describe as establishment or “RINO” Republicans. Chuck argues that the divide is not merely personal but rooted in real disagreements over how candidates should be selected and what kind of party Colorado Republicans should have. The hosts and Goodall criticize petitioning, open primaries, and donor influence, saying these systems produce candidates who are too liberal or insufficiently accountable to the Republican platform. Goodall says unity cannot mean forcing the overwhelming majority of grassroots members to submit to a small minority, arguing that true unity comes from standing with the majority rather than demanding capitulation.

A Call to Make the Colorado GOP Republican Again

Goodall closes by asking state central committee members to support him because he says he has been involved in the party’s battles since 2010 and understands the history firsthand. He frames his campaign as an effort to make the Colorado Republican Party “Republican again,” restore brand integrity, and move away from politics controlled by donor dollars. After Goodall leaves, the hosts continue discussing the Klenda judgment, the limits of appealing to the national Republican Party, and the difficulty of creating a new party or moving assets. The overall episode portrays the Colorado GOP as facing an existential test involving leadership, debt, legal threats, open primaries, and whether the grassroots can regain control of the party’s future.

Sons Of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

Look At How Far The People Have Let This Go.... Coming For Your Guns, People!

Guardians of the Second Amendment: Faith, Firearms, and the Fight Against Tyranny

Sons of Liberty: The Armed Resistance to Tyranny

Analysis of the 2026-05-04 broadcast on 2nd Amendment rights and constitutional sovereignty.

Mode B: Editorial

Core Philosophical Pillars

Divine Origin of Rights

Rights come from God, not the state. The 2nd Amendment doesn't grant rights; it denies the government the authority to infringe upon them.

The Hypocrisy of Protection

Critique of figures like Pope Francis and Barack Obama who utilize armed security details while advocating for the disarmament of the citizenry.

"To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."

— George Mason (1788)

#2ndAmendment #ConstitutionalMilitia #Sovereignty #BiblicalWorldview

Critical Flashpoints

!

The "Gun-Free Zone" Fallacy

Host claims 97% of mass murders occur in "unconstitutional free zones" which attract criminals by ensuring victims are disarmed.

i

Local Political Infiltration

Allegations regarding illegal aliens (e.g., Kholi Vang) holding office in Minnesota and attacking the constitutional rights of the people.

✓

The Militia Mandate

Call for the "well-regulated militia" (armed citizenry) to replace unconstitutional federal agencies in maintaining local security.

CALL TO ACTION

• Communicate with neighbors to form community defense.
• Hold representatives accountable for "un-laws."
• Reject "permission-based" rights; carry regardless of signage.

Source: Sons of Liberty Radio (Bradley Dean)

Reading Time: ~8 min | Audience: Constitutionalists, Christians



This broadcast of Sons of Liberty Radio, hosted by Bradley Dean, provides a fiery defense of the Second Amendment, framing the right to bear arms as a God-given mandate essential for resisting tyranny. Dean explores the perceived hypocrisy of global and domestic leaders who advocate for disarmament while remaining protected by armed security, calling on "we the people" to reclaim their constitutional authority.

The Hypocrisy of Disarmament and Global Agendas

The program opens by highlighting the stark contrast between the rhetoric of public figures and their personal security measures. Dean points to Pope Francis and former President Barack Obama as primary examples of "blatant hypocrisy," noting that both have advocated for global anti-gun measures while being shielded by dozens of armed Secret Service agents. He argues that "necessity" is often used as a plea for infringing upon human freedom, a tactic he labels as the argument of tyrants. This push for disarmament is framed not as a safety measure, but as a calculated effort by the United Nations and other global entities to "gut the pith and marrow" out of individual rights to facilitate a global government.

The Security Paradox

Public Rhetoric

"Disarm the People"

VS

Private Reality

Armed Protection

"They desire to disarm you while they are surrounded by armed security detail."

Constitutional Foundations and the Role of the Militia

Dean asserts that the Second Amendment does not grant rights but rather denies the government the authority to infringe upon rights already bestowed by God. Citing founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, and George Mason, the broadcast emphasizes that an armed citizenry is the only effective deterrent to enslavement. The "militia" is defined not as a government entity, but as the body of "we the people" who are constitutionally tasked with repealing invasions and suppressing domestic insurrections. Dean argues that the current "uni-party system" and "mockingbird media" work together to criminalize law-abiding citizens while aiding law-breakers, creating a "communist system" that spares the guilty and targets political opponents.

Biblical Justification for Self-Defense

Addressing critics who question a preacher's advocacy for firearms, Dean provides a scriptural framework for self-defense. He references 1 Samuel 13 to illustrate how oppressors historically disarm their subjects to maintain control. Furthermore, he cites the words of Jesus in Luke 22:36—"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and go buy one"—to argue that the New Testament mandates a state of vigilance and preparation against evil. From this perspective, "gun-free zones" are viewed as unconstitutional invitations to crime, as 97% of mass murders allegedly occur in these areas where victims are forcibly disarmed.

The Doctrine of Resistance

⚖️ Legal: The 2nd Amendment is a "Thou Shall Not" to the government.

📖 Biblical: Self-defense is a duty; the "sword" is a tool for the faithful.

🛡️ Practical: The only thing a felon fears is a victim who can fight back.

Political Infiltration and the Call to Accountability

A significant portion of the broadcast focuses on local issues in Minnesota, which Dean uses as a microcosm for national concerns. He criticizes the installation of individuals he deems "foreigners" and "invaders" into government offices—specifically mentioning Ilhan Omar and St. Paul Mayor Kholi Vang—arguing they are being used as "political battering rams" to upend American heritage. He calls out local law enforcement, particularly county sheriffs, labeling those who follow "unconstitutional orders" from governors as cowards and accomplices. The show concludes with a plea for citizens to stop asking for permission to exercise their rights and to begin organizing locally to hold corrupt officials accountable.

Key Data

Mass Murder Statistics: 97% of mass murders occur in "unconstitutional gun-free zones."

Artillery History: Henry Knox transported 59 artillery pieces (60 tons) over 300 miles to break the British siege in 1776.

Gun Ownership: There are over 400 million guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans.

To-Do / Next Steps

Read foundational documents: Citizens must read the Bible, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence to understand their true standing.

Refuse "Gun-Free" compliance: Law-abiding citizens should carry their firearms regardless of "unconstitutional" signs, as rights come from God, not the state.

Organize local communication: Neighbors must come together lawfully to communicate and prepare for potential assaults or societal instability.

Hold officials accountable: The American people must impeach and prosecute representatives who initiate policies that contradict the Constitution.

Support the mission: Listeners are encouraged to become a "Son or Daughter of Liberty" to keep the broadcast on the air without corporate sponsors.

Conclusion

The broadcast serves as a call to "eternal vigilance," asserting that liberty is maintained only through the active resistance of an armed and faithful populace. By linking constitutional originalism with biblical mandates, Dean challenges his audience to move beyond "cowardly" compliance and embrace their role as the true guardians of the American republic.

The Power Of Synergy with Gabrielle Cardona

The Power of Self-Care, Personality, and Positive Synergy
Positive Synergy: How Self-Care and Understanding Others Create Stronger Relationships

Synergy as Shared Energy and Responsibility

In this episode of The Power of Synergy, host Gabrielle Cardona opens by explaining that synergy is created when people come together with shared purpose, direction, and energy. Despite having technical difficulties and broadcasting by phone, she emphasizes that the day’s topic is too important to miss. She reminds listeners of her core principles: there is no neutral energy, there is no inertia, and personal power comes with responsibility. According to Cardona, every person affects others either positively or negatively, and even indifference counts as negative energy because it still impacts the people around us.

Self-Care as a Relationship Skill

The central theme of the episode is how to take good, quality care of yourself so you can bring something healthier into your relationships. Cardona explains that many people are skilled at caring for others but neglect themselves, while others focus only on themselves and struggle to respond to others’ needs. She frames self-care not as selfishness, but as a way of improving the quality and quantity of what a person can give. In her view, taking care of yourself properly allows you to enter relationships with stronger energy, clearer intention, and a more constructive attitude.

Knowing Your Strengths and Weaknesses

Cardona then moves into personality, functionality, and the importance of understanding what comes naturally to each person. She explains that people have different gifts, talents, strengths, and abilities, and that frustration in one area may point to strength in the opposite area. Rather than labeling people as failures because something is hard for them, she encourages listeners to see difficulty as useful information. When people understand what they are naturally good at, what drains them, and what kind of support they need, they become better able to contribute to others and form healthier connections.

Personality, MBTI, and Compassionate Understanding

During a call-in conversation with Nick, Cardona discusses MBTI concepts such as dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior functions, describing them as a way to understand what is easiest or hardest for someone to do. She explains that introversion and extroversion do not simply mean being social or antisocial, but relate to how people gather information, make decisions, and interact with the world. Nick notes that Cardona’s approach stands out because it includes compassion and self-compassion, and she responds by introducing her acronym ART: appreciation, respect, and trust. She says healthy connection requires appreciating, respecting, and trusting people’s AIM: their abilities, intentions, and motives.

Practical Tools for Energy, Motivation, and Focus

The episode becomes more practical as Cardona discusses daily self-care challenges such as low energy, lack of motivation, forgetfulness, and negative thoughts. She recommends identifying activities that restore energy based on personality, such as puzzles, walking, or hands-on coordination tasks. She also suggests using goals, milestones, rewards, checklists, affirmations, and journaling to stay focused and positive. Her point is that people can train their thoughts and habits in a healthier direction by consistently giving their minds constructive, believable, and purposeful messages.

The Philosophy of Success in Relationships

Cardona closes by presenting what she calls a philosophy of success: perform your dominant function for a significant portion of the day, be honest with people, and give more than you take. She uses the image of “recentering,” drawn from dance class, to explain that sometimes a person must step away, rebalance, and return in a better state. The episode concludes with the idea that relationships last when people approach one another honestly, without judgment, and with a willingness to understand both themselves and others. For Cardona, people are the greatest return on investment when they are approached in the right way, with positive energy and genuine synergy.

Bringing The Darkness To The Light with Catherine Nadal

Guest, Rene Benton

LEO Round Table with Chip DeBlock

S11E086, Mass Attack Plots Foiled Just In Time By Law Enforcement Across The Nation

LEO Roundtable: Balancing Recruitment Standards, Public Safety Threats, and Officer Mental Health

This episode of the LEO Roundtable features law enforcement professionals discussing the critical challenges of modern policing, including a 30% vacancy crisis, the successful thwarting of mass casualty plots in Virginia and Texas, and the legal complexities surrounding officer PTSD and public safety technology.

The Recruitment Crisis and Hiring Integrity
Chief Chris Noller highlighted a significant 30% vacancy rate within his department but emphasized a refusal to lower hiring standards. He argued that new hires serve as "cover" for existing officers for the next 20 years, necessitating high mental and physical aptitude. A major concern raised was the lack of mandatory national requirements for agencies to share internal affairs files, allowing problematic officers to move between states undetected. Noller advocated for a federal mandate requiring agencies to disclose performance history during the hiring process.

Thwarting Mass Casualty Plots
The panel discussed two major law enforcement successes in preventing mass violence. In Virginia, a 19-year-old unlicensed substitute teacher, Hayden Dollery, was arrested after allegedly posting a "kill list" and planning a "murder spree" at a local high school. The arrest was made possible by a tip through the "SafeToTalk" app. Separately, in Houston, the FBI and local police dismantled a plot by an 18-year-old woman and a 16-year-old boy to drive a vehicle into a synagogue during a crowded anniversary event. The panel credited these "wins" to effective community reporting and seamless federal-local cooperation.

Technology, Privacy, and Public Safety
The discussion shifted to the use of technology like "Flock" license plate readers. Chief Noller criticized legislative efforts (such as Colorado's Senate Bill 70) that seek to restrict law enforcement's access to public data without a warrant. He argued that such restrictions do not apply to federal agencies and only serve to impede local police from acting quickly on time-sensitive intel. The panel noted that while public privacy is important, there is no constitutional right to privacy in the public sphere, especially when technology is used to prevent imminent violence.

PTSD and the Legal Limits of Disability Protection
A significant portion of the talk focused on the Texas Supreme Court's decision to uphold the firing of a veteran Texas Ranger who suffered from PTSD and alcoholism. The court ruled that disability protections only apply if the condition does not impair a person's ability to perform their job safely. The panel debated the "catch-22" of hiring: while agencies are often restricted by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) from asking about mental health during interviews, they bear the ultimate liability if an officer "snaps" under pressure. There was a consensus that while officers deserve support and pathways to recovery, public safety must remain the priority.

The panel closes by discussing the difficult balance between supporting officers with PTSD and protecting the public from officers who cannot safely perform armed duties. Noller and Steiert agree that law enforcement and military personnel should have pathways to get help, and that agencies should not simply discard people who were harmed by service. At the same time, they argue that someone who cannot control emotions under stress cannot safely carry a badge and gun in public service. The conversation ends with a broader concern about hiring, disability laws, psychological screening, agency liability, and the importance of organizations like The Wounded Blue that support injured officers.

The discussion underscores a period of high tension for law enforcement, where the need for rapid technological response and community vigilance is balanced against the internal struggles of recruitment and officer mental health. The panel concluded that while law enforcement "wins" are frequent, the systemic issues of hiring integrity and mental health support require urgent, proactive management to maintain public trust.